Another Mystery Model

Friday, September 25, 2015

New Ways of Showing Breast

There’s nothing less rewarding than making a general appeal for more tastefulness.  Good taste, or specifically tastefulness is considered to be in the eye of the beholder, so anyone can avoid taking the appeal seriously by invoking this fact.

A case in point is the recent interest in showing a (part of) the breast that has really been around since the seventies, when girls began wearing larger armholes, to show off a particularly erogenous part of the breast, namely the little of it closest to the armpit.  In this article, a blogger called Alexandra explains why she believes this style is ‘Not Cool.’  I have to say I agree with most of her points.

It is overdone.  This is where taste comes in.  Because young women have nowhere to turn to get an assessment of tastefulness, we have an escalation of breast-baring styles.  Evidently most modern women have never studied fashions of the past, to see how this style can be adapted to be perfectly satisfying.  Revealing a little of the outermost part of the breast has been around for centuries, certainly since Greek times, and there has been lots of opportunity for discovering styles that make the little that is shown flattering, rather than overwhelming.

A young person's style
There’s absolutely no doubt that typically it is a style that flatters women with firm breasts, which usually means young women who have never given birth, or women who have had surgery to insert implants or otherwise firm up the breast.  I don’t like the idea of elective surgery generally, and I dislike that so many women feel obliged to undergo it for the sake of their lovers, male or female.  But I think this particular style works well for girls who have had breast augmentation, provided it is done well.  (Breast augmentation does not always work out nicely; I don’t want to mention names, but some of the former Bruce Jenner’s in-laws have had unfortunate experiences with their body modification.  I feel that it is so unfair that a good boob job is probably beyond the means of the typical citizen; it outrages my sense of fairness.  On the other hand, I don’t think the Taxpayer can be expected to subsidize elective surgery unless [a] all other essential needs of every citizen are met first, and [b] elective surgery stops costing such a fortune.)

I’m dying to post some examples of what I consider tasteful exposure of the breast, but I’m reluctant to offend anyone on this front (or this side), because I feel that it is so unfair to rub its potency in the faces of women, who are subjected to an onslaught of these sorts of pressures already.  But I would hate to see the style die out, just because some women overdo it.  I have noticed that some men bloggers are appealing for restraint, which I think is fantastic.  Quite apart from the fact that I’m rather a prude (and not proud of it), I think dressing tastefully is just incredibly sexy, but I’m afraid that my opinion won’t carry much weight, just because of who I am.  Okay, well, I guess one little picture won’t hurt:

Down to the Skin is not needed
The style to which I refer (okay, let’s just come out and call it what they call it on the Web: side-boob) works beautifully if a translucent undergarment is worn.  Girls have worn sheer underblouses for a decade, when they set out to show off their midriffs.  (Some of them drew attention to their bellies by constantly tugging at the bloody things with fake coyness.  Fakeness is endemic among teenagers.)  Many of the more charming fashions do have a sheer panel that obscures the breast, while at the same time drawing tasteful attention to it, without the need for fake tugging.

A bra for the style?
The article suggests that the style does not work with a bra.  Well, with conventional bras, probably not.  It won’t be long before someone invents a sheer bra that supports the breast, but shows off the side of it.  How hard can it be?  There is mesh fabric available today that is pretty strong.  The panel can go fairly high, if it is made of mesh.

In conclusion, let it be known that Kay Hemlock Brown endorses side-of-the-breast-baring styles, as long as it is done with some taste.

Wednesday, September 23, 2015

Jane—The Early Years

I recently decided to publish the prequel to Jane that I had written about earlier, under the name Jane—The Early Years.  This should make my one (documented) fan happy!  It is not a sequel, as desired, but still, it tells you a lot about Jane, and how matters came to be.

I had a great old time putting a good cover together; in the end, I used a representation of Scorpia, Jane's alter ego, a personality invented by Jane and Co. who appears at Metal Fetish gatherings, in a mask, and goes about being a wise guy.  (Scorpia reappears in the continuation of Jane, after she meets Lisa Love, who persuades her to make a feature film.  This part has not been written yet; I suspect that it will be two parts, actually.  The first will be a protracted holiday in Canada, and the second part will be Jane acting her part as Scorpia, until Lisa finds out who's behind the mask.)

The cover is at right.  I imagined that the mask would be much more opaque, and cover up most of Jane's face, but that would have looked horrible on the cover of a book, so I used this sort of "wrought iron" filigree mask instead.

Unlike Jane, The Early Years is not free; but it is priced at about $2, and I'm hoping it will sell well.  I have only sold a total of 19 books, which makes me hardly an author at all.  Please go out and buy the book you all; it goes on sale on Saturday.

Kay.

[Added later:  I don't think I will ever succeed in designing a cover more attractive and more appropriate than this one on the right, for Early Years.  It is colorful --perhaps painfully so, to the taste of some-- and unfortunately it depicts one of two possible scenes that would be perfect covers.  I wish there were similar scenes in the other books!  I mean, there are, but I just can't pull them off with the resources I have.]

Sunday, September 13, 2015

Scrivener versus Word

I recently bought a program called Scrivener, which helps writers organize their material.  I have used Microsoft Word for years and years, and have become sort of a minor authority on Word.  Before Word, I used WordPerfect, a word-processor that has largely gone out of use, and I had an almighty battle with Word to figure out how to use it.  Every time I get a new program, I have to really struggle to get to use it effectively, only to learn it so well that it is once again a struggle to use a different program, as becomes inevitably necessary sooner or later.

To get started, let me say a little about WordPerfect.  It was a perfectly good program for everything I wanted to do.  Obviously, I used a lot of different styles, starting with italics and boldface, and various colors, and tables, and margins, and so on.  If you don't want any of this, you should just use an editor, like Notepad (or Emacs, which you've probably never heard of).

Small to Medium Documents:  WordPerfect and MS Word
Let’s start with Italics.  In WordPerfect, when you want Italics, you select a portion of text, and turn it on.  Inside the program, it places a sort of invisible marker that says Italics starts here, and then at the end of the selection, it puts another marker stop italics here.  In addition, WordPerfect had a split-screen mode, where you could actually see where these markers were.  The screen looked like this:
The two tags in the lower screen that show where Italics start and stop are just there to help the user.  I could delete either tag, and the whole Italics thing would go off, and the text would be plain once again.

Then I started using Word, because many computers I had to work on only had Word, and I was frustrated because I did not know how to get rid of Italics precisely, because I could not see the tags.  In later years, Word made it possible to see these things, and my comfort level went up.

As my writing projects grew larger —and they grew enormous— the WordPerfect implementation of a wordprocessor which actually placed those invisible markers in the text, became too clumsy.  If something went wrong, which it does most of the time, the program would go insane, looking for italics tags that had got accidentally deleted, without WordPerfect knowing about it.  (Don’t ask.)  Word, in contrast, flags every character as either italicized or not.  It therefore doesn’t have to go looking for tags, which is a point in its favor.  As WordPerfect got harder to find, and as all my friends started using Word, and because PowerPoint and Excel came along with Word, I decided to use Word, just about the time when Word started implementing “character”-type attributes, like Italics and Bold, and “paragraph”-type attributes, like margins and indents, which WordPerfect had done long before.

With Word, you can get your (short-to-medium-sized) document to print out almost exactly how you want it.  Word is a good general-purpose word processor, especially if you take the time to learn all its features (and if Microsoft stops fooling with it every so often).

Large Documents: Scrivener
Once I started writing really large documents —or when my short documents became enormous documents while my back was turned— I had to resort to keeping them as entire folders of chapters, which were later combined into a single book.  Word (and WordPerfect, for the record,) has a method of “linking in” subdocuments, to make a longer document, but somehow that doesn’t work as well as it should.

Enter Scrivener.

Scrivener is more of a document organizing program than a document creating program, and furthermore, I haven't still learned how to use it well.

To give you a quick overview, Scrivener looks like PowerPoint, where you see the list of slides down the left, and you usually see one slide on the rest of the screen.  Lots of other programs are like this, for instance such things as PageMaker, or QuarkXpress, where you have immediate access to any portion of your project.  There is a panel along the left (called the Binder) that contains lots of documents and folders.  Each folder would normally be a chapter, and inside each folder, you get a number of scenes.  This allows you to rearrange the scenes as you prefer (not trivial, but just needs careful dragging, really), just as you would rearrange slides in PowerPoint.  In fact, there is a view very much like Slide Sorter View (that you get in PowerPoint) in Scrivener in which you can just rearrange things pretty much by dragging things around.

If rearranging your scenes within a chapter is a central problem in managing a large writing project —and it is, for me— then Scrivener will help you immensely.

You can even do your writing in Scrivener.  It has a rudimentary editor that can do most of what you want: Italics, Boldface, Colors, etc.  However, once you apply a certain style to a piece of text, Scrivener forgets that the block has that style, unlike Word.  In Word, you can modify the style, and then all instances of that style will change throughout the document.  In Scrivener, you have to go back and change each instance —if you really want to.

You can put all sorts of text into Scrivener, e.g. Word documents, RTF documents, plain text, HTML, Open Document format text, etc, etc.  Getting text into Scrivener is not hard, provided you don’t already have a structure in your document which you want to preserve.  If you do, you have to work harder, and find out for yourself how that is done; I don’t want to set myself up as a Scrivener authority, because I just don’t know enough.  There is a website forum, where you join up, and ask all the questions you want from people who really know.

Compiling
Once you’re ready to take a look at your document, to print it, or read it through, or send it off to a publisher or anyone, you make a single document out of it by Compiling.  At this stage, you can get Scrivener to make anything in the document —that it recognizes— look any way you want.  You can tell it to make the Chapter Titles look like so, and the paragraphs look like so, and so on.  I’m still trying to figure how to make an excerpt from a letter look the way I want.

Scrivener can compile your project as an Ebook directly.  It does a really good job of this.  It can also compile to pdf format (to be read on Acrobat Reader).  It can also compile your project into the form of a Word document!  And, as a bonus, your styles will be a nice, minimal set, just the way Smashwords likes it.  (Smashwords doesn’t like millions of different styles throughout your document; if they find too many styles, they ask you to fix your book.  Consistency of style is one ingredient of a professional-looking piece of writing.)

The software you use really affects the outcome of what you produce to some degree, so I hope this blog post helps you choose the appropriate tool for your writing.

Kay

Tuesday, September 1, 2015

Helen's Eventful Summer

Well, I did it.

For whatever reason, the latter part of the enormous Helen saga was written rotating among several threads very rapidly.  For one thing, I had introduced a large number of fascinating characters, and I did not want to abandon them, so they keep having interesting and related adventures.

So, I published —actually pre-published— an enormous chunk (90,000 words, give or take) just a few minutes ago.  This has some stories that I just love: Helen meets a call-girl, Melanie; Helen meets Jana, the intense Czech girl; Helen and the gang hear of a Tornado attack (completely fictitious) in Kansas, and go on a mission of mercy; Crystal, a Freshman in college, falls in love with Janet; Vicky, another call girl stalks Helen; Tommy meets a girl in Chicago, and falls in love; Elly meets a girl in Philly.  Marcus and Gena have sex for the first time, which results in a bed being destroyed.

Experienced authors, of course, always insist on writers weeding out all except the most important characters in their novels.  I categorically reject this advice; I am special, and I want to write my way!  (Who do they think they are, anyway?)  It isn't just that I want to make money; I just want to make my writing available, just in case someone likes it, that's all.  I have made a total of $25 from all my writing, and I'm not very upset.

I need a nice cover.  I don't have a cover at all, and that's my project for tonight.

Kay

P.S. Well, I created one, but I'm not sure I like it.  Here it is, at right:

If you read the book, you will learn that the last several episodes is about Tom (Tomasina, Helen's half-sister, the child of Helen's Dad and Grandma Elly, Janet's mother), who decides to appear in a adult video.  One scene has Tommy riding her Honda bike along an abandoned highway, with this Italian teenager seated in front of her, when suddenly the girl decides to stand up on the bike.  This is practically impossible, especially if the girl is wearing a loose antique wedding gown.  But I wanted this for my cover so bad!!!  I have numerous photographs of girls riding motorbikes very sedately, but I want one with a passenger seated in front of the rider, at least on her knees, on the way to standing up, while the rider herself is clothed only in chaps and a vest, or completely naked.  I don't think I will ever be able to find one ..--Kay